In a unanimous decision in Medtronic v. Mirowski Family Ventures LLC (“Mirowski”), the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals and held that patent owners bear the burden of proving infringement even when the case is brought by a licensee that is not in breach of its license.

Medtronic had licensed several patents from Mirowski for implantable pacemakers. While continuing to pay royalties into an escrow account, Medtronic sued and sought a declaration that several of its products were not covered by the licensed patents. The Delaware district court found for Medtronic because Mirowski failed to prove that Medtronic’s products were infringing, but the Federal Circuit reversed on appeal and held that Medtronic needed to prove that its products did not infringe Mirowski’s patents.

The Supreme Court, however, agreed with the district court that, even though the licensee brought the challenge, the burden of proving infringement still remained with Mirowski. As the Court explained, as between the patent owner and the licensee, the patent owner is better suited to explain how its patent is infringed.

In our opinion, this decision provides a further incentive for patent licensees to challenge unfavorable license arrangements.

image_printPrint

Who We Are

Danielson Legal is a boutique intellectual property and technology law firm in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

We represent international, national and regional companies, both large and small, in a variety of trademark, patent, copyright, licensing, and related areas of practice.

Contact

Cambridge, MA
Office

Danielson Legal LLC

t: (617) 714-9579
f: (888) 742-8097

One Mifflin Place
Suite 400
Cambridge, MA 02138
USA

Contact

Fargo, ND
Office

Danielson Legal LLC

t: (701) 540-5913
f: (888) 742-8097

503 7th ST N
Suite 107
Fargo, ND 58102
USA

Contact

Waltham, MA
Office

Danielson Legal LLC

t: (617) 714-9579
f: (888) 742-8097

375 Totten Pond Road
Suite 102
Waltham, MA 02451
USA